Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing...
Reopening notice invalid, income already considered in regular assessment. General info insufficient reason. Mechanical sanction, no application of mind.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing Officer had already considered entries related to Long/Short Term Capital Gains/Losses, Unsecured Loans, Share Premium, Bogus Gains, Contrived Losses during regular assessment. Court held that since AO had considered issue during regular assessment, impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening based on general information received from investigation wing regarding script Kaushal Limited was not valid. Reasons recorded did not disclose particular income escapement. Impugned notice issued without application of mind and sanction granted mechanically. Notice based on information already considered during regular assessment, hence quashed and set aside in favor of assessee.
Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing Officer had already considered entries related to Long/Short Term Capital Gains/Losses, Unsecured Loans, Share Premium, Bogus Gains, Contrived Losses during regular assessment. Court held that since AO had considered issue during regular assessment, impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening based on general information received from investigation wing regarding script Kaushal Limited was not valid. Reasons recorded did not disclose particular income escapement. Impugned notice issued without application of mind and sanction granted mechanically. Notice based on information already considered during regular assessment, hence quashed and set aside in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
