Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements. Assessee stated transactions pertained to prior assessment years. Tribunal held previous year's transactions cannot be considered income in current assessment year. Transactions related to FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, for which AO passed order u/s 143(3) on 29.01.2016 accepting closing balance of director's ledger account. AO cannot consider opening balance in current assessment year for making addition, relying on Sridev Enterprises judgment. Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) order deleting the addition, decided in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
