Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.