Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.