Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Cenvat credit on immovable property constructed after issuance of completion certificate is not permissible, as transaction is treated as sale of goods, not service. Cenvat credit can be taken only on receipt of inputs and within one year from date of documents. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as appellant was aware of ineligibility for credit after completion certificate. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 and levy of interest upheld. Appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.