Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Page of 4884
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 97661 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%. Madras and Karnataka High Courts upheld 6% rate, rejecting higher rates claimed. Section 11BB empowers Central Government to fix rate between 5-30% through notification. Notification 67/2003 validly issued fixing 6% rate. Appellant's contention of order being beyond show cause notice unsustainable. Appeal dismissed, affirming impugned orders.
Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%. Madras and Karnataka High Courts upheld 6% rate, rejecting higher rates claimed. Section 11BB empowers Central Government to fix rate between 5-30% through notification. Notification 67/2003 validly issued fixing 6% rate. Appellant's contention of order being beyond show cause notice unsustainable. Appeal dismissed, affirming impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
