Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Appellant eligible for abatement without prior payment of duty for period when machine under closure. As per Rule 10 of Pan Masala Packaging Machine Rules, 2008, and CESTAT precedents, abatement claimable sans duty payment for closure period. Demand of duty unsustainable, impugned orders set aside, appeal allowed.
Appellant eligible for abatement without prior payment of duty for period when machine under closure. As per Rule 10 of Pan Masala Packaging Machine Rules, 2008, and CESTAT precedents, abatement claimable sans duty payment for closure period. Demand of duty unsustainable, impugned orders set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.