Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within limitation even if presumption of notice service within reasonable 30 days applied. Complainant not required to prove notice service before institution; accused to rebut deemed service presumption under Evidence Act. Trial courts must ensure compliance with NI Act provisions at registration stage. Appellate court judgment set aside, case remitted for fresh hearing.
Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within limitation even if presumption of notice service within reasonable 30 days applied. Complainant not required to prove notice service before institution; accused to rebut deemed service presumption under Evidence Act. Trial courts must ensure compliance with NI Act provisions at registration stage. Appellate court judgment set aside, case remitted for fresh hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
