Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within limitation even if presumption of notice service within reasonable 30 days applied. Complainant not required to prove notice service before institution; accused to rebut deemed service presumption under Evidence Act. Trial courts must ensure compliance with NI Act provisions at registration stage. Appellate court judgment set aside, case remitted for fresh hearing.
Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within limitation even if presumption of notice service within reasonable 30 days applied. Complainant not required to prove notice service before institution; accused to rebut deemed service presumption under Evidence Act. Trial courts must ensure compliance with NI Act provisions at registration stage. Appellate court judgment set aside, case remitted for fresh hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
