COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The impugned show cause notice (SCN) did not contain any...
GST registration cancellation order & SCN set aside due to vague allegations violating natural justice. Cryptic notice can't be basis for cancellation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The impugned show cause notice (SCN) did not contain any specific allegations against the petitioner regarding issuance of invoices without supply of goods, merely referring to Rule 21(g) and stating violation of Rule 86B. The SCN lacked details of invoices allegedly not covered by supply of goods, violating principles of natural justice as the noticee could not respond to vague allegations. The impugned order cancelling GST registration with retrospective effect went beyond the scope of the SCN. The High Court set aside the cancellation order and SCN, directing restoration of the petitioner's GST registration forthwith, as the cryptic allegations could not be the basis for cancellation.
The impugned show cause notice (SCN) did not contain any specific allegations against the petitioner regarding issuance of invoices without supply of goods, merely referring to Rule 21(g) and stating violation of Rule 86B. The SCN lacked details of invoices allegedly not covered by supply of goods, violating principles of natural justice as the noticee could not respond to vague allegations. The impugned order cancelling GST registration with retrospective effect went beyond the scope of the SCN. The High Court set aside the cancellation order and SCN, directing restoration of the petitioner's GST registration forthwith, as the cryptic allegations could not be the basis for cancellation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
