Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.