Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.