Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.