Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Validity of reassessment proceedings questioned due to delayed digital submission of Form 10. Emphasis on due disclosure over procedural digital filing requirements. Section 11(2) applicability debated as Form 10 not timely submitted u/s 139(1) without condonation of delay. Court notes change in filing requirements post 2015 Act. Reassessment solely based on late Form 10 submission, not on escaped income assessment. Court stresses reassessment requires opinion of tax evasion, not just delayed filing. Refers to Supreme Court ruling on mandatory Form 10 submission for Section 11 benefits. Writ petition allowed, impugned order u/s 148A(d) quashed, reassessment proceedings annulled.
Validity of reassessment proceedings questioned due to delayed digital submission of Form 10. Emphasis on due disclosure over procedural digital filing requirements. Section 11(2) applicability debated as Form 10 not timely submitted u/s 139(1) without condonation of delay. Court notes change in filing requirements post 2015 Act. Reassessment solely based on late Form 10 submission, not on escaped income assessment. Court stresses reassessment requires opinion of tax evasion, not just delayed filing. Refers to Supreme Court ruling on mandatory Form 10 submission for Section 11 benefits. Writ petition allowed, impugned order u/s 148A(d) quashed, reassessment proceedings annulled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
