Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Validity of reassessment proceedings questioned due to delayed digital submission of Form 10. Emphasis on due disclosure over procedural digital filing requirements. Section 11(2) applicability debated as Form 10 not timely submitted u/s 139(1) without condonation of delay. Court notes change in filing requirements post 2015 Act. Reassessment solely based on late Form 10 submission, not on escaped income assessment. Court stresses reassessment requires opinion of tax evasion, not just delayed filing. Refers to Supreme Court ruling on mandatory Form 10 submission for Section 11 benefits. Writ petition allowed, impugned order u/s 148A(d) quashed, reassessment proceedings annulled.
Validity of reassessment proceedings questioned due to delayed digital submission of Form 10. Emphasis on due disclosure over procedural digital filing requirements. Section 11(2) applicability debated as Form 10 not timely submitted u/s 139(1) without condonation of delay. Court notes change in filing requirements post 2015 Act. Reassessment solely based on late Form 10 submission, not on escaped income assessment. Court stresses reassessment requires opinion of tax evasion, not just delayed filing. Refers to Supreme Court ruling on mandatory Form 10 submission for Section 11 benefits. Writ petition allowed, impugned order u/s 148A(d) quashed, reassessment proceedings annulled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.