Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The District Inspector of Schools wrongly deducted income tax at 30% from arrears paid on salary due to a misunderstanding of tax rates. Finance and Accounts Officer claimed the error was due to misinterpretation and clarified her role as advisory. High Court found the conduct vindictive and indicative of incompetence, directing an inquiry by Additional Chief Secretary. High Court also ordered the Director of Education to explain the delay and consider awarding interest to the petitioner. The case is scheduled for the week commencing 02.09.2024.
The District Inspector of Schools wrongly deducted income tax at 30% from arrears paid on salary due to a misunderstanding of tax rates. Finance and Accounts Officer claimed the error was due to misinterpretation and clarified her role as advisory. High Court found the conduct vindictive and indicative of incompetence, directing an inquiry by Additional Chief Secretary. High Court also ordered the Director of Education to explain the delay and consider awarding interest to the petitioner. The case is scheduled for the week commencing 02.09.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
