Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The District Inspector of Schools wrongly deducted income tax at 30% from arrears paid on salary due to a misunderstanding of tax rates. Finance and Accounts Officer claimed the error was due to misinterpretation and clarified her role as advisory. High Court found the conduct vindictive and indicative of incompetence, directing an inquiry by Additional Chief Secretary. High Court also ordered the Director of Education to explain the delay and consider awarding interest to the petitioner. The case is scheduled for the week commencing 02.09.2024.
The District Inspector of Schools wrongly deducted income tax at 30% from arrears paid on salary due to a misunderstanding of tax rates. Finance and Accounts Officer claimed the error was due to misinterpretation and clarified her role as advisory. High Court found the conduct vindictive and indicative of incompetence, directing an inquiry by Additional Chief Secretary. High Court also ordered the Director of Education to explain the delay and consider awarding interest to the petitioner. The case is scheduled for the week commencing 02.09.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
