Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling sc...
Stamp valuation increases after registration-fee payment led to deletion of property-purchase addition within tolerance and without valuation referral...
Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case discusses the validity of proceedings against the legal representatives of a deceased assessee when reopening notices in the name of the assessee have expired. The court held that legal representatives have the right to contest proceedings and determine the extent of liability. However, in this case, the respondents failed to follow the provisions of Section 159, leading to the set-aside of the reopening notice against the deceased assessee. The court granted liberty to the Revenue to proceed against the legal heirs if permitted by law.
The case discusses the validity of proceedings against the legal representatives of a deceased assessee when reopening notices in the name of the assessee have expired. The court held that legal representatives have the right to contest proceedings and determine the extent of liability. However, in this case, the respondents failed to follow the provisions of Section 159, leading to the set-aside of the reopening notice against the deceased assessee. The court granted liberty to the Revenue to proceed against the legal heirs if permitted by law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
