Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The case discusses the validity of proceedings against the legal representatives of a deceased assessee when reopening notices in the name of the assessee have expired. The court held that legal representatives have the right to contest proceedings and determine the extent of liability. However, in this case, the respondents failed to follow the provisions of Section 159, leading to the set-aside of the reopening notice against the deceased assessee. The court granted liberty to the Revenue to proceed against the legal heirs if permitted by law.
The case discusses the validity of proceedings against the legal representatives of a deceased assessee when reopening notices in the name of the assessee have expired. The court held that legal representatives have the right to contest proceedings and determine the extent of liability. However, in this case, the respondents failed to follow the provisions of Section 159, leading to the set-aside of the reopening notice against the deceased assessee. The court granted liberty to the Revenue to proceed against the legal heirs if permitted by law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
