Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corpus donations, being distinct from incomes derived from trust property, are granted exemption separately u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(d) of the Act. There is no overlapping exemption. Different incomes recognized for exemption have been separately granted exemption. Corpus donations cannot claim exemption under both sub-clauses (d) and (a) of Section 11(1). The assessee was unable to point out any infirmity in this interpretation during the hearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were either distinguishable on facts or rendered without considering the clear provision of law. The assessee's appeal seeking exemption u/s 11(1)(a) for corpus donations received was dismissed.
Corpus donations, being distinct from incomes derived from trust property, are granted exemption separately u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(d) of the Act. There is no overlapping exemption. Different incomes recognized for exemption have been separately granted exemption. Corpus donations cannot claim exemption under both sub-clauses (d) and (a) of Section 11(1). The assessee was unable to point out any infirmity in this interpretation during the hearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were either distinguishable on facts or rendered without considering the clear provision of law. The assessee's appeal seeking exemption u/s 11(1)(a) for corpus donations received was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
