Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corpus donations, being distinct from incomes derived from trust property, are granted exemption separately u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(d) of the Act. There is no overlapping exemption. Different incomes recognized for exemption have been separately granted exemption. Corpus donations cannot claim exemption under both sub-clauses (d) and (a) of Section 11(1). The assessee was unable to point out any infirmity in this interpretation during the hearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were either distinguishable on facts or rendered without considering the clear provision of law. The assessee's appeal seeking exemption u/s 11(1)(a) for corpus donations received was dismissed.
Corpus donations, being distinct from incomes derived from trust property, are granted exemption separately u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(d) of the Act. There is no overlapping exemption. Different incomes recognized for exemption have been separately granted exemption. Corpus donations cannot claim exemption under both sub-clauses (d) and (a) of Section 11(1). The assessee was unable to point out any infirmity in this interpretation during the hearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were either distinguishable on facts or rendered without considering the clear provision of law. The assessee's appeal seeking exemption u/s 11(1)(a) for corpus donations received was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
