Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service tax refund claim allowed by Appellate Tribunal for...
Service tax refund allowed on additional charges recovered from customers without availing CENVAT credit. Gross amount charged basis for service tax payable.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Service tax refund claim allowed by Appellate Tribunal for additional service tax paid on charges recovered from customers. Appellant issued credit notes to customers for additional charges along with service tax thereon. Customers did not avail CENVAT credit. As per contract, appellant was required to transmit gas through pipeline to buyers' premises. Additional charges over approved rate for gas transmission during October 2008 to July 2009 were not approved by Ministry. Service tax payable u/s 67 on gross amount charged by service provider. Since gross amount charged was less by additional service charge, service tax paid thereon is refundable. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Service tax refund claim allowed by Appellate Tribunal for additional service tax paid on charges recovered from customers. Appellant issued credit notes to customers for additional charges along with service tax thereon. Customers did not avail CENVAT credit. As per contract, appellant was required to transmit gas through pipeline to buyers' premises. Additional charges over approved rate for gas transmission during October 2008 to July 2009 were not approved by Ministry. Service tax payable u/s 67 on gross amount charged by service provider. Since gross amount charged was less by additional service charge, service tax paid thereon is refundable. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
