Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Section 125(1) of SVLDR Scheme disqualifies persons subjected to enquiry/investigation where duty involved was not quantified by 30.06.2019. Section 121(m) defines "enquiry/investigation" to include recording statements. Firm's representative's statement recorded on 06.07.2007 falls within this definition. However, twin conditions of enquiry/investigation and non-quantification before 30.06.2019 not satisfied as duty quantification formula prescribed by HC order. Hence, rejection of firm and partners' applications under SVLDR Scheme not justified, quashed and set aside. Petition allowed.
Section 125(1) of SVLDR Scheme disqualifies persons subjected to enquiry/investigation where duty involved was not quantified by 30.06.2019. Section 121(m) defines "enquiry/investigation" to include recording statements. Firm's representative's statement recorded on 06.07.2007 falls within this definition. However, twin conditions of enquiry/investigation and non-quantification before 30.06.2019 not satisfied as duty quantification formula prescribed by HC order. Hence, rejection of firm and partners' applications under SVLDR Scheme not justified, quashed and set aside. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.