Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Tribunal extending stay of demand beyond 365 days u/s 254(2A) is permissible if delay in disposing appeal is not attributable to assessee. Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods (P) Ltd. struck down proviso prohibiting extension beyond 365 days even if delay not caused by assessee. Supreme Court upheld Delhi High Court's decision. Bombay High Court in Fulford (India) Ltd. refused to entertain Revenue's appeals challenging Tribunal orders granting extension, in line with Pepsi Foods.
Tribunal extending stay of demand beyond 365 days u/s 254(2A) is permissible if delay in disposing appeal is not attributable to assessee. Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods (P) Ltd. struck down proviso prohibiting extension beyond 365 days even if delay not caused by assessee. Supreme Court upheld Delhi High Court's decision. Bombay High Court in Fulford (India) Ltd. refused to entertain Revenue's appeals challenging Tribunal orders granting extension, in line with Pepsi Foods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
