Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to rectify the error due to passage of time. The court held that the denial was a bona fide mistake, and the IDA who deducted and paid the tax was made a party. Refund denial could lead to the petitioner's company closing down, considering the huge refund amount. The court directed the respondent authorities to facilitate opening the portal for a limited period or allow manual rectification upon the petitioner's representation, as this is a peculiar and special circumstance. The assessing officer can verify the specific deductions claimed with the returns filed by the IDA. The petition was allowed.
Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to rectify the error due to passage of time. The court held that the denial was a bona fide mistake, and the IDA who deducted and paid the tax was made a party. Refund denial could lead to the petitioner's company closing down, considering the huge refund amount. The court directed the respondent authorities to facilitate opening the portal for a limited period or allow manual rectification upon the petitioner's representation, as this is a peculiar and special circumstance. The assessing officer can verify the specific deductions claimed with the returns filed by the IDA. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.