Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to rectify the error due to passage of time. The court held that the denial was a bona fide mistake, and the IDA who deducted and paid the tax was made a party. Refund denial could lead to the petitioner's company closing down, considering the huge refund amount. The court directed the respondent authorities to facilitate opening the portal for a limited period or allow manual rectification upon the petitioner's representation, as this is a peculiar and special circumstance. The assessing officer can verify the specific deductions claimed with the returns filed by the IDA. The petition was allowed.
Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to rectify the error due to passage of time. The court held that the denial was a bona fide mistake, and the IDA who deducted and paid the tax was made a party. Refund denial could lead to the petitioner's company closing down, considering the huge refund amount. The court directed the respondent authorities to facilitate opening the portal for a limited period or allow manual rectification upon the petitioner's representation, as this is a peculiar and special circumstance. The assessing officer can verify the specific deductions claimed with the returns filed by the IDA. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
