Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before CIT(A). AO repeated disallowance in assessment order u/s 143(3). CIT(A erred in granting relief against unchallenged disallowance u/s 143(1)(a). Exemption u/s 10(23FB) was rejected by AO and CIT(A, which assessee did not challenge, attaining finality. Assessee's alternative claim for exemption u/s 10(38) for long-term capital gains on share sale was not a fresh claim but change of section, hence admissible. Exemption u/s 10(38) was rightly allowed by CIT(A as conditions under clauses (a) and (b) were met, and third proviso regarding STT was satisfied through notification covering unlisted shares acquired. Assessee, being a trust, is a legal person assessable under the Act and entitled to exemptions, not a pass-through entity u/s 115U as exemption u/s 10(23FB) was denied.
Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before CIT(A). AO repeated disallowance in assessment order u/s 143(3). CIT(A erred in granting relief against unchallenged disallowance u/s 143(1)(a). Exemption u/s 10(23FB) was rejected by AO and CIT(A, which assessee did not challenge, attaining finality. Assessee's alternative claim for exemption u/s 10(38) for long-term capital gains on share sale was not a fresh claim but change of section, hence admissible. Exemption u/s 10(38) was rightly allowed by CIT(A as conditions under clauses (a) and (b) were met, and third proviso regarding STT was satisfied through notification covering unlisted shares acquired. Assessee, being a trust, is a legal person assessable under the Act and entitled to exemptions, not a pass-through entity u/s 115U as exemption u/s 10(23FB) was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
