Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Addition based on unsubstantiated documents like loose sheets, jottings, and Excel sheets - unaccounted cash receipts from students - cannot be sustained. Statements recorded solely cannot constitute incriminating material for additions. Unsubstantiated loose papers without corroboration by inquiry or leading to undisclosed assets cannot be basis for additions. Suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. AO failed to establish live link between seized material and unaccounted fees resulting in undisclosed assets. Uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence. Presumption u/s 132(4) is rebuttable. AO should act judicially on adequate material, not arbitrarily. Additions cannot be made without examining concerned students/parents. Mere notes in diaries/loose sheets require corroboration. Non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence showing undisclosed income cannot be relied upon for additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
