Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonor of cheque case - Issuance of summons - Cheque furnished as security covered u/s 138 of NI Act or not? - Scope and limited jurisdiction of High Court u/s 482 CrPC. Dispute based on books of accounts, complainant submitted invoices, ledger accounts, agreement. Accused contended cheques retained to recover outstanding dues. Complainant produced blank cheques given by accused as security. High Court prima facie opined difficulty in examining disputed facts at this stage. Issue whether cheques sent with purchase order discharged outstanding liability subject to trial. Outstanding dues existed on cheque issuance date. Entertaining quashing petition would result in finality without adducing evidence. Ingredients of Section 138 made out, complaint maintainable. No case for exercising extraordinary jurisdiction to quash criminal case. Petition dismissed.
Dishonor of cheque case - Issuance of summons - Cheque furnished as security covered u/s 138 of NI Act or not? - Scope and limited jurisdiction of High Court u/s 482 CrPC. Dispute based on books of accounts, complainant submitted invoices, ledger accounts, agreement. Accused contended cheques retained to recover outstanding dues. Complainant produced blank cheques given by accused as security. High Court prima facie opined difficulty in examining disputed facts at this stage. Issue whether cheques sent with purchase order discharged outstanding liability subject to trial. Outstanding dues existed on cheque issuance date. Entertaining quashing petition would result in finality without adducing evidence. Ingredients of Section 138 made out, complaint maintainable. No case for exercising extraordinary jurisdiction to quash criminal case. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
