Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Circular No.9 dated 24.05.2019 challenged - authority to delegate power of adjudication by circular contrary to Section 167 requiring notification - assessing authority being inspecting authority leading to conflict of interest. Court held circular traceable to Section 2(91), not Section 167, hence notification unnecessary for authorizing adjudication power. Reliance on Gujarat HC judgment rejecting similar challenge. Adjudication of factual disputes beyond Article 226 writ jurisdiction when alternative remedy available. Writ petition against Circular No.9 and assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21 rejected. Petition disposed of.
Circular No.9 dated 24.05.2019 challenged - authority to delegate power of adjudication by circular contrary to Section 167 requiring notification - assessing authority being inspecting authority leading to conflict of interest. Court held circular traceable to Section 2(91), not Section 167, hence notification unnecessary for authorizing adjudication power. Reliance on Gujarat HC judgment rejecting similar challenge. Adjudication of factual disputes beyond Article 226 writ jurisdiction when alternative remedy available. Writ petition against Circular No.9 and assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21 rejected. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
