COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Advances given to 5 persons without charging interest were for business purposes. Non-installation of machinery or renovation in subsequent period due to non-viability cannot negate the business purpose. Assessee decided not to proceed with its plan due to bad market condition, which is a valid business decision and consequential expenditure cannot be disallowed. Assessee had sufficient interest-free capital exceeding the interest-free advances, hence disallowance of interest is impermissible as per jurisdictional High Court precedents.
Advances given to 5 persons without charging interest were for business purposes. Non-installation of machinery or renovation in subsequent period due to non-viability cannot negate the business purpose. Assessee decided not to proceed with its plan due to bad market condition, which is a valid business decision and consequential expenditure cannot be disallowed. Assessee had sufficient interest-free capital exceeding the interest-free advances, hence disallowance of interest is impermissible as per jurisdictional High Court precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.