Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Advances given to 5 persons without charging interest were for business purposes. Non-installation of machinery or renovation in subsequent period due to non-viability cannot negate the business purpose. Assessee decided not to proceed with its plan due to bad market condition, which is a valid business decision and consequential expenditure cannot be disallowed. Assessee had sufficient interest-free capital exceeding the interest-free advances, hence disallowance of interest is impermissible as per jurisdictional High Court precedents.
Advances given to 5 persons without charging interest were for business purposes. Non-installation of machinery or renovation in subsequent period due to non-viability cannot negate the business purpose. Assessee decided not to proceed with its plan due to bad market condition, which is a valid business decision and consequential expenditure cannot be disallowed. Assessee had sufficient interest-free capital exceeding the interest-free advances, hence disallowance of interest is impermissible as per jurisdictional High Court precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
