Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Quashing of criminal proceedings u/s 156(3) of Cr.P.C. was ordered as the complainant admitted inability to perform work due to financial condition, despite agreement containing arbitration clause and ongoing arbitration proceedings between parties. The dispute arose when complainant failed to complete work within stipulated time, leading to show cause notice. Complainant's response acknowledged stoppage of construction activities due to financial constraints caused by GST imposition and other hindrances, requesting settlement of accounts. The court held it to be a civil dispute arising out of contract, quashed impugned High Court order(s), and allowed appeals u/s 482 Cr.P.C.
Quashing of criminal proceedings u/s 156(3) of Cr.P.C. was ordered as the complainant admitted inability to perform work due to financial condition, despite agreement containing arbitration clause and ongoing arbitration proceedings between parties. The dispute arose when complainant failed to complete work within stipulated time, leading to show cause notice. Complainant's response acknowledged stoppage of construction activities due to financial constraints caused by GST imposition and other hindrances, requesting settlement of accounts. The court held it to be a civil dispute arising out of contract, quashed impugned High Court order(s), and allowed appeals u/s 482 Cr.P.C.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.