Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Inward supply of motor vehicles used for demonstration purposes in the course of business of supplying motor vehicles cannot be availed as input tax credit on capital goods. Motor vehicles supplied for demo purpose are treated as a different category compared to those supplied for sales, and are capitalized by the dealership as per customary business practices. The audited books of accounts reflect the true and fair position of the business. According to Section 17(5)(a)(A), input tax credit on motor vehicles is available only when they are further supplied. Since the appellant is not holding the goods for further supply, the exception u/s 17(5)(a)(A) does not apply, and input tax credit on motor vehicles used for demo purposes cannot be allowed under the GST Act. By capitalizing the motor cars, they are treated as assets for use in the business and cannot be considered as held for further supply.
Inward supply of motor vehicles used for demonstration purposes in the course of business of supplying motor vehicles cannot be availed as input tax credit on capital goods. Motor vehicles supplied for demo purpose are treated as a different category compared to those supplied for sales, and are capitalized by the dealership as per customary business practices. The audited books of accounts reflect the true and fair position of the business. According to Section 17(5)(a)(A), input tax credit on motor vehicles is available only when they are further supplied. Since the appellant is not holding the goods for further supply, the exception u/s 17(5)(a)(A) does not apply, and input tax credit on motor vehicles used for demo purposes cannot be allowed under the GST Act. By capitalizing the motor cars, they are treated as assets for use in the business and cannot be considered as held for further supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
