Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as AO reopened with non-application of mind and higher authorities granted approval u/s 151 mechanically without verifying facts. Assessee, a non-resident Australian entity, received fees from another non-resident for telecasting rights, not taxable in India. AO erroneously assumed assessee had income generating activities and failed to file return. DRP disposed objections referring to non-filing of TDS return despite AO admitting no remittances or TDS. DRP failed to discharge duties properly by not considering facts and law. Reopening lacked jurisdiction, hence quashed. Decided in assessee's favor.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as AO reopened with non-application of mind and higher authorities granted approval u/s 151 mechanically without verifying facts. Assessee, a non-resident Australian entity, received fees from another non-resident for telecasting rights, not taxable in India. AO erroneously assumed assessee had income generating activities and failed to file return. DRP disposed objections referring to non-filing of TDS return despite AO admitting no remittances or TDS. DRP failed to discharge duties properly by not considering facts and law. Reopening lacked jurisdiction, hence quashed. Decided in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.