Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Misdeclaration regarding description and quantity of imported goods admitted. Declared goods liable for confiscation due to misdeclaration. Proper investigation not conducted to determine actual transaction value. No admissible evidence for contemporaneous imports. Declared value accepted for declared goods. Appellant failed to furnish evidence for value of excess 140 cartons. Assessable value of excess cartons upheld at Rs.3,56,510/-. Redemption fine reduced to Rs.35,000/- and penalty to Rs.20,000/-. Appeal partly allowed.
Misdeclaration regarding description and quantity of imported goods admitted. Declared goods liable for confiscation due to misdeclaration. Proper investigation not conducted to determine actual transaction value. No admissible evidence for contemporaneous imports. Declared value accepted for declared goods. Appellant failed to furnish evidence for value of excess 140 cartons. Assessable value of excess cartons upheld at Rs.3,56,510/-. Redemption fine reduced to Rs.35,000/- and penalty to Rs.20,000/-. Appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
