Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-compete fees paid by assessee were held to be revenue expenditure, deductible u/s 28(va) of Income Tax Act. Relying on Gujarat High Court's decision in Smartchem Technologies Limited, ITAT ruled that expenditure related to profit-earning apparatus is revenue in nature. Disallowance of non-compete fees by lower authorities was unjustified. Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Non-compete fees paid by assessee were held to be revenue expenditure, deductible u/s 28(va) of Income Tax Act. Relying on Gujarat High Court's decision in Smartchem Technologies Limited, ITAT ruled that expenditure related to profit-earning apparatus is revenue in nature. Disallowance of non-compete fees by lower authorities was unjustified. Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4920 
