Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence...
Appellate authority's inconsistent approach in accepting/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for lack of evidence while accepting department's contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towards assessee and department. Order quashed, petition allowed by way of remand.
Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for lack of evidence while accepting department's contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towards assessee and department. Order quashed, petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.