Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business expediency for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 hence disallowance u/s 40A(3) was justified. Cash deposits in bank account were treated as unexplained income as assessee couldn't prove source. Addition regarding license fee paid to Excise Department was set aside for verification by AO. Assessee's appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business expediency for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 hence disallowance u/s 40A(3) was justified. Cash deposits in bank account were treated as unexplained income as assessee couldn't prove source. Addition regarding license fee paid to Excise Department was set aside for verification by AO. Assessee's appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
