Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The NCLAT held that the Supreme Court's clarification in M/S. TULIP STAR HOTELS LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS MR. ANISH NIRANJAN NANAVATY & ANR. stated that reworking/verification of claims would not impact the Resolution Plan or its implementation. The re-verification of Pegasus's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) at 14.85%, upon Pegasus's request, was valid, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly approved it. The Appellant, a shareholder and promoter, was not proposed any amount in the Resolution Plan. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's approval of the Resolution Plan in accordance with the statutory scheme and dismissed the appeal.
The NCLAT held that the Supreme Court's clarification in M/S. TULIP STAR HOTELS LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS MR. ANISH NIRANJAN NANAVATY & ANR. stated that reworking/verification of claims would not impact the Resolution Plan or its implementation. The re-verification of Pegasus's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) at 14.85%, upon Pegasus's request, was valid, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly approved it. The Appellant, a shareholder and promoter, was not proposed any amount in the Resolution Plan. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's approval of the Resolution Plan in accordance with the statutory scheme and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
