Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for another year. The TPO must examine the assessee's work profile, agreements with AEs, functions performed, qualifications and experience of employees, and remuneration paid to determine whether the assessee is an ITeS/KPO/high-end BPO or a low-end BPO. The TPO shall decide the ALP afresh after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee as per due process. The assessee must produce relevant documents to substantiate its non-KPO/ITeS status. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
There is inconsistency in adjudicating the assessee's functional profile. The Tribunal treated the assessee as TPO/KPO for certain years but as a non-KPO/ITeS for another year. The TPO must examine the assessee's work profile, agreements with AEs, functions performed, qualifications and experience of employees, and remuneration paid to determine whether the assessee is an ITeS/KPO/high-end BPO or a low-end BPO. The TPO shall decide the ALP afresh after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee as per due process. The assessee must produce relevant documents to substantiate its non-KPO/ITeS status. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.