Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Appellate Tribunal held that service of order to a contract security person cannot be considered valid service u/s 37C(a), as he was not an authorized agent. Appellant traced the order on a later date after receiving recovery notice. Appeal was allowed for remand to Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on merits, as it was earlier rejected on time bar without considering merits.
Appellate Tribunal held that service of order to a contract security person cannot be considered valid service u/s 37C(a), as he was not an authorized agent. Appellant traced the order on a later date after receiving recovery notice. Appeal was allowed for remand to Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on merits, as it was earlier rejected on time bar without considering merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.