PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension period u/s 10A of the IBC. The Respondent admitted the debt and default, and the consistent default date of 10.07.2021 in the fresh application substantiated the Appellant's claim. Each failure to pay an installment constituted a fresh default, justifying initiation of insolvency proceedings u/s 7 of the IBC. The Appeal was allowed, admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.
The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension period u/s 10A of the IBC. The Respondent admitted the debt and default, and the consistent default date of 10.07.2021 in the fresh application substantiated the Appellant's claim. Each failure to pay an installment constituted a fresh default, justifying initiation of insolvency proceedings u/s 7 of the IBC. The Appeal was allowed, admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
