Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension period u/s 10A of the IBC. The Respondent admitted the debt and default, and the consistent default date of 10.07.2021 in the fresh application substantiated the Appellant's claim. Each failure to pay an installment constituted a fresh default, justifying initiation of insolvency proceedings u/s 7 of the IBC. The Appeal was allowed, admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.
The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension period u/s 10A of the IBC. The Respondent admitted the debt and default, and the consistent default date of 10.07.2021 in the fresh application substantiated the Appellant's claim. Each failure to pay an installment constituted a fresh default, justifying initiation of insolvency proceedings u/s 7 of the IBC. The Appeal was allowed, admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.