Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The period of limitation for filing a petition u/s 34 of the Arbitration Act commenced from 1st July 2022, excluding 30th June 2022 when the award was received. The three-month limitation period expired on 30th September 2022, a day before the pooja vacation commenced on 1st October 2022. The appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act as the prescribed period ended on 30th September 2022. The maximum 30-day extension u/s 34(3) expired on 30th October 2022, but the petition was filed on 31st October 2022. The High Court rightly held that the petition was not filed within the specified period u/s 34(3). The appeal was dismissed.
The period of limitation for filing a petition u/s 34 of the Arbitration Act commenced from 1st July 2022, excluding 30th June 2022 when the award was received. The three-month limitation period expired on 30th September 2022, a day before the pooja vacation commenced on 1st October 2022. The appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act as the prescribed period ended on 30th September 2022. The maximum 30-day extension u/s 34(3) expired on 30th October 2022, but the petition was filed on 31st October 2022. The High Court rightly held that the petition was not filed within the specified period u/s 34(3). The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.