Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged - capital gain on co-owned land sale - reassessment based on DVO report alleging suppression of lower valuation - reasons recorded did not mention forming reason to believe due to DVO report in co-owner's case - reliance on DVO report to justify reopening untenable as no fresh material part of recorded reasons - petitioner fully disclosed material facts during original assessment - change of opinion for reopening by impugned notice u/s 148 untenable - impugned notice unsustainable - assessee entitled to benefit enjoyed by co-owners whose valuation accepted - permitting impugned notice an exercise in futility - assessee appeal allowed.
Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged - capital gain on co-owned land sale - reassessment based on DVO report alleging suppression of lower valuation - reasons recorded did not mention forming reason to believe due to DVO report in co-owner's case - reliance on DVO report to justify reopening untenable as no fresh material part of recorded reasons - petitioner fully disclosed material facts during original assessment - change of opinion for reopening by impugned notice u/s 148 untenable - impugned notice unsustainable - assessee entitled to benefit enjoyed by co-owners whose valuation accepted - permitting impugned notice an exercise in futility - assessee appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
