Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) u/ss 90/90A due to late...
Late filing of Form 67 for Foreign Tax Credit allowed if before assessment order. Provision directory, not mandatory. Tax authority's rejection improper.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) u/ss 90/90A due to late filing of Form 67 was challenged. As per rules, Form 67 should be filed along with the original return u/s 139(1). The issue was whether this provision is mandatory or directory. The court, relying on precedents, held that the filing requirement in Rule 128 for FTC is directory in nature, being a rule for implementing the Act's provisions. Even if FTC was filed after the original return but before the final assessment order, it should be allowed. Since FTC was filed before intimation u/s 143(1), the tax authority's rejection was improper and not in accordance with law. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
Denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) u/ss 90/90A due to late filing of Form 67 was challenged. As per rules, Form 67 should be filed along with the original return u/s 139(1). The issue was whether this provision is mandatory or directory. The court, relying on precedents, held that the filing requirement in Rule 128 for FTC is directory in nature, being a rule for implementing the Act's provisions. Even if FTC was filed after the original return but before the final assessment order, it should be allowed. Since FTC was filed before intimation u/s 143(1), the tax authority's rejection was improper and not in accordance with law. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.