Request-driven road restoration attracts reverse-charge GST, not governmental-function treatment or compensatory-damages status for business recipient...
Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline works are taxable Government services, with reverse charge liability and no public-function exemption...
Model-wise import cap monitoring cannot justify withholding used multifunction machines where all-India tracking is absent and full security is furnis...
The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust approved u/s 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the Trust was entitled to exemption as there was no indication otherwise. The respondent's rejection based on filing errors without considering the exemption claim requires reconsideration. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within three months considering the court's observations.
The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust approved u/s 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the Trust was entitled to exemption as there was no indication otherwise. The respondent's rejection based on filing errors without considering the exemption claim requires reconsideration. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within three months considering the court's observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
