Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust approved u/s 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the Trust was entitled to exemption as there was no indication otherwise. The respondent's rejection based on filing errors without considering the exemption claim requires reconsideration. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within three months considering the court's observations.
The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust approved u/s 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the Trust was entitled to exemption as there was no indication otherwise. The respondent's rejection based on filing errors without considering the exemption claim requires reconsideration. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within three months considering the court's observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
