Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The case involved a dispute over the appealability of assessments and the refund of excess customs duty payment. The appellate tribunal held that the refund claim was rejected as it was not part of the final reassessment order. The appellant should have challenged the final reassessment order to modify the amount. Refund proceedings cannot alter assessments unless modified. All assessments, including self-assessments, are appealable. The appellant's claim for refund was rightly rejected, citing the principle of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed as there were no merits.
The case involved a dispute over the appealability of assessments and the refund of excess customs duty payment. The appellate tribunal held that the refund claim was rejected as it was not part of the final reassessment order. The appellant should have challenged the final reassessment order to modify the amount. Refund proceedings cannot alter assessments unless modified. All assessments, including self-assessments, are appealable. The appellant's claim for refund was rightly rejected, citing the principle of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed as there were no merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
