Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The case involves an appeal before the CESTAT challenging an assessment that led to an enhancement of value accepted by the importer. The CBIC's circular dated 02.11.2023 sets a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs below which no appeal can be filed before the CESTAT. The duty amount in this appeal falls below this threshold. Citing a Bombay High Court decision, the appeal is deemed not maintainable as per the CBIC's instructions. Therefore, the appeal has been dismissed.
The case involves an appeal before the CESTAT challenging an assessment that led to an enhancement of value accepted by the importer. The CBIC's circular dated 02.11.2023 sets a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs below which no appeal can be filed before the CESTAT. The duty amount in this appeal falls below this threshold. Citing a Bombay High Court decision, the appeal is deemed not maintainable as per the CBIC's instructions. Therefore, the appeal has been dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
